大部分人，在剛開始合伙時，只講兄弟情誼，不講規(guī)則，覺得是朋友、是親戚，關(guān)系不錯，反正掙了錢大家一起分，多多少少無所謂。這種狀態(tài)的合伙人，一般都是兄弟式合伙，后走向仇人式散伙的結(jié)局。一般會經(jīng)歷同心協(xié)力→同床異夢→同室操戈→同歸于盡的過程。

Most people, at the beginning of the partnership, only talked about brotherhood, not rules. They thought they were friends, relatives and had a good relationship. Anyway, if they earned money, they would share it with each other, no matter how much. Partners in this state usually form a brotherly partnership, which eventually leads to an enemy style breakup. Generally, they will go through the process of working together, sleeping in the same bed, fighting in the same room, and dying together.

濟南合伙設(shè)計公司認為在進行合伙兒股權(quán)設(shè)計前，先要了解，不同的持股比例，對應(yīng)的權(quán)利有哪些，如何行使和保障這些權(quán)利，講規(guī)則設(shè)計在合伙之前，做到有據(jù)可依，真正發(fā)生矛盾時，用規(guī)則說話。

Jinan Partnership Design Company believes that before designing partnership equity, it is necessary to understand the different shareholding ratios, corresponding rights, and how to exercise and protect these rights. Rule design should be based on evidence before the partnership, and when there is a real conflict, rules should be used to speak.

《公司法》規(guī)定，公司除法定或約定的重大事項外，其他事項的決策須經(jīng)出席會議的股東所持表決權(quán)過半數(shù)通過。但是，在企業(yè)發(fā)展過程中，公司引入新的投資者后，原來股東的股權(quán)比例會被稀釋，如原來占股51%的股東，將會下降到51%以下，所以，僅憑個人的股權(quán)將可能難以維持控制權(quán)。

The Company Law stipulates that decisions on matters other than major statutory or agreed upon matters must be approved by a majority of the voting rights held by the shareholders present at the meeting. However, in the rapid development process of the enterprise, after the company introduces new investors, the equity ratio of the original shareholders will be diluted. For example, the shareholders who originally accounted for 51% of the shares will decrease to below 51%, so it may be difficult to maintain control solely based on individual equity.

《公司法》第四十三條第二款規(guī)定:“股東會會議作出修改公司章程、增加或者減少注冊資本的決議，以及公司合并、分立、解散或者變更公司形式的決議，必須經(jīng)代表三分之二以上表決權(quán)的股東通過。”根據(jù)上述規(guī)定，占股67%以上股東，如無特別約定，將擁有三分之二以上的表決權(quán)，擁有了對公司的絕對話語權(quán)。

Article 43 (2) of the Company Law stipulates: "Resolutions made by the shareholders' meeting to amend the company's articles of association, increase or reduce registered capital, as well as resolutions on the merger, division, dissolution or change of company form of the company, must be passed by shareholders representing two-thirds or more of the voting rights." According to the above provisions, shareholders who hold 67% or more of the shares will have two-thirds or more of the voting rights unless otherwise agreed, Having absolute say in the company.

因為二人合伙沒有其他股東可在中間協(xié)調(diào)和溝通，常常表現(xiàn)為要么是黃金搭檔，要么直面矛盾對峙，所以不要選擇各占50%的均分股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)。51%和49%相對控股的結(jié)構(gòu)，也不利于修改公司章程、增資等重大事項的決策。99%和1%的結(jié)構(gòu)中，大股東股權(quán)比例過大，而小股東又太小，基本上會找不到股東的感覺，實質(zhì)上與打工者無異。

Because a two person partnership does not have other shareholders to coordinate and communicate in the middle, it often manifests as either a golden partner or facing conflicts and confrontations, so do not choose an equally divided equity structure of 50% each. The structure of 51% and 49% relative control is also not conducive to decision-making on major matters such as modifying the company's articles of association and increasing capital. In the structure of 99% and 1%, the proportion of major shareholders' equity is too large, while the proportion of minority shareholders is too small, which basically makes it difficult to find the feeling of shareholders, essentially similar to those of migrant workers.

綜上所述，對兩人合伙創(chuàng)業(yè)來說，67%∶33%、70%∶30%、80%∶20%的股權(quán)比例較為合理。

In summary, for a partnership venture between two individuals, the equity ratios of 67% to 33%, 70% to 30%, and 80% to 20% are more reasonable.

如果后期有新的股東進入，或者現(xiàn)在有兩個合伙人一起進來，三個股權(quán)應(yīng)該怎么分比較合理？

If new shareholders enter in the later stage, or if two partners come together now, how should the three equity shares be divided reasonably?

三人合伙的股權(quán)分配應(yīng)按“大股東股權(quán)占比>(二股東股權(quán)占比+三股東股權(quán)占比)”的原則進行。在這種情況下，有一個大股東擁有絕對的主導(dǎo)權(quán)，有利于公司決策。

The equity distribution of a three person partnership should be based on the principle of "major shareholder equity ratio>(two shareholder equity ratio+three shareholder equity ratio)". In this situation, having a major shareholder with absolute control is beneficial for the company's decision-making.

千萬不要采用“大股東股權(quán)占比<(二股東股權(quán)占比+三股東股權(quán)占比)”的模式，這種持股比例存在的問題是，對重要事項的決策，三股東可以“綁架”大股東和二股東。

Never adopt the model of "major shareholder equity ratio<(second shareholder equity ratio+third shareholder equity ratio)". The problem with this shareholding ratio is that the third shareholder can "kidnap" the major shareholder and the second shareholder when making decisions on important matters.

當大股東與二股東意見不一致時，兩人將不得不看三股東的臉色行事。綜上所述，對三人合伙創(chuàng)業(yè)來說，67%∶20%∶13%、70%∶20%∶10%、80%∶10%∶10%的股權(quán)比例較為合理。

When the major shareholder and the second shareholder disagree, the two will have to act based on the faces of the third shareholder. In summary, for a three person partnership, the equity ratios of 67%: 20%: 13%, 70%: 20%: 10%, and 80%: 10% are more reasonable.

合伙股權(quán)設(shè)計前先了解不同的持股比例權(quán)利相關(guān)事項就講解到這里了，希望能夠給您好的幫助，更多事項就來我們網(wǎng)站http://zhenzhush.com進行咨詢了解！

Before designing the partnership equity, let's first understand the different shareholding ratios and rights related matters. That's all. I hope it can be helpful to you. For more information, please come to our website http://zhenzhush.com Conduct consultation to understand!